Tana River Mangabey

Wild Tana River mangabey with fawn-gray fur, a parted crown and a dark face, perched beside a palm trunk on the lower Tana River in Kenya
A wild Tana River mangabey (Cercocebus galeritus) on the lower Tana River, Kenya. Photo: Michal Sloviak, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Cropped and color-corrected.

The Tana River mangabey is a ground-foraging monkey from coastal Kenya. Its scientific name is Cercocebus galeritus.[1] It lives only in forests along the lower Tana River. A small number may also live in the Tana Delta. It is one of the Old World monkeys. The IUCN lists it as Critically Endangered.[2]

Primate Profile
Tana River Mangabey
Cercocebus galeritus · The ground-foraging mangabey of Kenya's Tana River forests
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Chordata
Class
Mammalia
Order
Primates
Family
Cercopithecidae
Genus
Cercocebus
Species
galeritus
Authority
Peters, 1879

This Critically Endangered mangabey lives only along Kenya's lower Tana River.

Face of a wild Tana River mangabey with a dark face, white eyelids and a parted crown
Wild Tana River mangabey, Tana River, Kenya. Photo: Michal Sloviak, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Cropped and color-corrected.
CR
IUCN STATUSCritically Endangered
  • Common NamesTana River mangabey, Tana River crested mangabey, Tana mangabey, Garau (Kipokomo)
  • Taxonomy Classification Year1879
  • Monkey SizeLarge and slender; one mounted type was 135 cm long, tail included
  • Skin Color(s)Yellowish to fawn-gray fur, pale underside, black face, white eyelids
  • HabitatFlood-plain and riverine forest, with nearby woodland and bushland
  • DietMainly seeds and fruit, plus insects, snails and new shoots
  • Native CountriesKenya
  • It lives in about 27 small forests along a 60-km river stretch.
  • Its crown hair parts and sweeps out over the forehead.
  • It forages mostly on the ground for seeds and fruit.
  • Groups average 27 animals; most 1970s groups had multiple adult males.
  • The 2019 Red List assessment estimated about 1,000 animals.

Tana River Mangabey Distribution


Natural Earth 1:50m (public domain). Projected to match the original BE SVG Maps coordinate space. ids are ISO 3166-1 alpha-2, or "_name" where no code exists. data-bb is the path bounding box, used for offscreen pruning.
Countries
Kenya ()

Tana River Mangabey Guide:
Infographic on the Tana River mangabey: a Critically Endangered mangabey of the lower Tana River forests in Kenya, with its looks, groups, diet and numbers
The Tana River mangabey at a glance. Photo: Michal Sloviak, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Cropped and color-corrected.

Name and Classification

Wilhelm Peters described this monkey in 1879. His type specimen came from Mitole, near the Tana River mouth. Today it sits in the genus Cercocebus, the white-eyelid mangabeys.

Local Pokomo guides call it Garau.[3] Older papers call it the Tana River crested mangabey.

Its relatives were long lumped into one species. The agile mangabey and golden-bellied mangabey were once its subspecies. So was the Sanje mangabey of Tanzania. Major references now rank all four as species, but debate continues.[4]

In 1974, Colin Groves questioned that grouping. To him, the agile mangabey was no closer kin. The collared mangabey and sooty mangabey were just as close.

A 2026 genetic study links it with agile, golden-bellied and Sanje mangabeys. Tana, agile and Sanje loud calls once seemed indistinguishable.

Physical Description

A 1974 field report describes a yellowish monkey with a light underside. Its black face contrasts with the fur. Hair parts on the front of the crown. Long hairs then sweep out over the forehead.

Another observer called its fur fawn-gray.[5] It was described as large and slender, with a semi-prehensile tail. That fur places it among the yellow monkeys. Its fawn-gray tones also fit the gray monkeys.

It has white eyelids and a backswept crest. Its face is dark gray to black.

The Berlin type adds detail.[6] Long, blackish brown crown hairs fall over the ears. The throat and underparts are yellowish white. The hands and feet are blackish brown.

An adult male can look like a baboon at first. A female or young one can pass for a vervet monkey. The parting on the crown gives it away.

Size and Weight

Measurements of live Tana mangabeys are not published on open sources. Elliot listed measurements of the mounted type in Berlin. Its total length was 1,350 mm (53 in). The tail made up 730 mm (29 in). That leaves a head and body of about 62 cm (24 in). The sex of the type is not stated.

One study says it matches the Tana River red colobus in size.[7] No reliable weights for this species appear in open sources.

Similar Species Compared

The agile mangabey lives in Central African forests.[8] Its range covers Cameroon, Gabon, both Congos and the Central African Republic. Its type skin is pale reddish brown, with yellow-tipped hairs. It eats fruit, seeds and shoots, and sometimes infant duikers. At Mondika, groups averaged 21 animals. The IUCN lists it as Least Concern.

The Sanje mangabey lives in Tanzania's Udzungwa Mountains.[9] It was first described in 1981, without a formal name.[10] Its face is nearly cream, unlike the Tana mangabey's dark face. Its coat is intermediate between the Tana and agile mangabeys. It lives in submontane and montane forest, up to 2,000 m. The IUCN lists it as Endangered.

The Tana River red colobus shares the same river forests.[11] It is gray with a red cap. It is a leaf eater and rarely comes to the ground. Both monkeys are Critically Endangered.

Side-by-side photos of a fawn-gray Tana River mangabey with a dark face and a Sanje mangabey with a cream face
Left: Tana River mangabey, Tana River, Kenya. Photo: Michal Sloviak, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Right: Sanje mangabey, Tanzania. Photo: Marc Veraart, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Cropped and color-corrected.
TraitTana River mangabeyAgile mangabeySanje mangabeyTana River red colobus
Scientific nameCercocebus galeritusCercocebus agilisCercocebus sanjeiPiliocolobus rufomitratus
RangeLower Tana River, Kenya; a few groups in the Tana DeltaCameroon, Gabon, Congo, DR Congo and Central African RepublicUdzungwa Mountains, TanzaniaLower Tana River and possibly the Tana Delta, Kenya
HabitatFlood-plain and gallery forest, nearby bushland, 20 to 40 mSwamp and riverine forest, also non-flooded forest, up to 1,024 mSubmontane and montane forest, 290 to 2,000 mRiverine and flood-plain forest patches
Coat and key marksYellowish to fawn-gray, pale underside, black face, parted crownPale reddish brown with yellow tips, yellowish white underside (type skin)Coat between Tana and agile mangabeys, nearly cream faceGray body, red crown, darker tail, black face
Head and bodyAbout 62 cm, computed from one mounted type, sex unknownNot knownNot knownNot known
TailAbout 73 cm, one mounted type, sex unknownNot knownNot knownNot known
DietMainly seeds and fruit, plus insects and snailsFruit, seeds and shoots; sometimes infant duikersMostly fruit, nuts and seedsLeaves; a folivore
Group sizeAbout 27 on average, 6 to 62 (2019 assessment)Mondika mean 21; one habituated group about 135Mean group sizes from 15 to over 70About 13 on average (1994 census)
IUCN statusCritically Endangered (2019 assessment)Least Concern (2018 assessment)Endangered (2016 assessment)Critically Endangered (2019 assessment)

Range and Distribution

It is found only in Kenya. It lives along a 60-km stretch of the lower Tana River. Its range runs north to Nkanjonja and south to Hewani. A small number may live in the Tana Delta.

It lives in about 27 small forests, some of them isolated. They range from 1 to 500 ha (2.5 to 1,240 acres). In 1994, it occupied less than 26 square km (10 sq mi). Their elevation is 20 to 40 m (66 to 131 ft).

A 2024 action plan reports a few groups in the Tana Delta.[12]

Habitat Needs

It lives in flood-plain forest and riverine gallery forest. It also uses nearby woodland and bushland. These forests grow in a dry region.

They depend on river floods and groundwater, not rain.[13] Most grow within about 1 km (0.6 mi) of the river. Across 38 months, annual rainfall averaged 582 mm (23 in).

Forest size and tree density best predicted its numbers.[14] Inside the reserve, the main food trees also mattered.

Diet and Feeding

The IUCN calls it frugivorous. It feeds mostly on the ground and up to 2 m high. That fruit-based diet makes it one of the frugivorous monkeys.

Seeds topped the diet of one group in 2000 and 2001. Seeds made up 46.5% of the year's feeding. Fruit made up 25.6%. Insects and snails made up 10.9%. New stems added 7.6%, and leaves only 3.8%. The animal food also counts it among the omnivorous monkeys.

The wild date palm is a key food.[15] It can supply up to 62% of the monthly diet. Mangabeys rely on its fruits and seeds when other fruit is scarce. People also harvest every part of this palm.

The seeds it eats are very hard.[16] Their mean crushing resistance was 12.8 kg. That beats seeds eaten by other hard-object feeders.

Two groups were followed for 13 months in the 1970s.[17] When food grew scarce, they ate a wider mix of foods. They also searched more ground and moved farther.

Its forest changed over 13 years.[18] By 2000, its diet species had shifted from 1988.

Behavior and Groups

It is semi-terrestrial. It is at home high in trees or on the ground. Groups average about 27 animals, with a range of 6 to 62.

Groups held 13 to 36 animals in the 1970s. Most had more than one adult male. Extra males lived alone near the groups.

In the dry season, groups defended territories. Adult males used loud spacing calls and displays. In the rains, groups could mix into crowds of 40 to 50.

Two groups showed flexible defense.[19] They avoided each other when fruit was scarce. They mixed peacefully when fruit was plentiful and spread out. They fought when rich fruit was clumped in one spot.

The adult male loud call is called the whoop-gobble. A 1974 report described deep grunting booms, then hoarse screeches. Groups often traded these calls at dawn.

One group's yearly range nearly tripled.[20] It used 17.25 ha (43 acres) in 1974. It used 46.75 ha (116 acres) in 2000 and 2001. Its size went from 36 to 17, then to 50 animals.

It can cross up to 1 km of nonforest matrix between forests.[21] One group averaged 100 minutes in one matrix area. It spent most of that time eating.

In 2004, a study group split into two.[22] It was the first reported group fission in Cercocebus.

It shares sleeping trees with the yellow baboon.[23] The two species never used a site at the same time. On forest edges, it also meets the vervet monkey.

Breeding and Young

Seven wild females were followed through pregnancy.[24] Gestation averaged 180 days. All showed sexual swellings after the first two months of pregnancy.

A mother guards her infant closely for two months. In the third month, it plays more with peers.

A 2018 dissertation summarizes earlier birth data.[25] It reports year-round breeding with a peak from October to February. Its listed predators are crowned eagles, rock pythons, leopards and yellow baboons.

Population and Status

Estimates have swung over the decades. A 1972 survey estimated about 2,245, but called it unreliable. Homewood estimated 1,000 to 1,500 in 1975.

Between 1975 and 1985, numbers fell an estimated 45%.[26] The action plan gives a 1994 estimate of 1,000 to 1,200.

A 2001 census of 73 forest patches counted 2,070.[27] They lived in 59 groups. About 56% of groups lived inside the reserve.

No full census has been published since. The 2019 Red List assessment estimated about 1,000. The trend was downward. The 2024 action plan says it may now number below 1,000.

The 2024 action plan puts its effective population size below 100. Yet it keeps high genetic diversity.[28] Females stay in the groups where they were born.

The IUCN listed it as Endangered in 2008. It was moved to Critically Endangered in 2019. Assessors predict a fall of over 80% within 33 years. That is especially likely if the reserve is annulled.

Major Threats

Its forests keep shrinking. One study tracked 21 years of forest loss up to 2001.[29] Forest area fell by 34.5% in that time. Loss was 38% outside the reserve and 29.2% inside.

People clear forest for farms. Fires, livestock and wood cutting damage the patches. Fig trees are felled to make canoes. People also harvest its key food, the wild date palm.

Dams change the river itself. Five hydroelectric dams upriver have altered flows and floods. That alters the water table and floods the forests need. The Red List described a sixth dam as under construction. Large irrigation schemes would come with it.

Some farmers kill it as a crop pest. Insecurity and inter-ethnic violence make protection harder.

Groups in disturbed forest fared worse.[30] They were smaller and traveled farther each day. They also had larger home ranges and lower fecundity.

Conservation Efforts

Kenya created the Tana River Primate National Reserve in 1976. It covers about 169 square km (65 sq mi). The 2019 assessment put about 56% of the mangabeys inside it.

In January 2007, the High Court of Kenya ordered the reserve annulled. Kenya's 2013 wildlife law sets the rules for that step.[31] The Cabinet Secretary must publish the notice. Parliament must approve the proposal. The 2024 action plan says it has not happened.

The same law lists it as Critically Endangered in Kenya. It is on CITES Appendix I.

The Ndera Community Conservancy was set up in 2010. It aims to protect forest along the lower Tana. The Tana Delta became a Ramsar Site in 2012.

It was among the 25 most endangered primates for 2002 to 2004. The action plan calls for a full census and forest restoration. It also calls for restoring the Mchelelo research camp.

Explore more monkeys starting with T. Or browse all types of monkeys.

Common Questions

Where does the Tana River mangabey live?

It lives only in Kenya, in forests along the lower Tana River. A few groups also live in the Tana Delta.

What does the Tana River mangabey eat?

It eats mainly seeds and fruit, often from the wild date palm. It also eats insects, snails and new shoots.

How many Tana River mangabeys are left?

The 2019 Red List assessment estimated about 1,000. Numbers were falling.

Is the Tana River mangabey endangered?

Yes. The IUCN lists it as Critically Endangered. Forest loss is the main threat.

How big are Tana River mangabey groups?

Groups average about 27 animals. They range from 6 to 62.

How can you tell the Tana River mangabey from the Sanje mangabey?

The Tana River mangabey has a dark face. The Sanje mangabey's face is nearly cream.

Cite this page

BioExplorer. (2026, November 2). Tana River Mangabey. https://www.bioexplorer.net/animals/mammals/monkeys/tana-river-mangabey/

Key References
  • [1] – Mammal Diversity Database. Cercocebus galeritus W. C. H. Peters, 1879, MDD ID 1000597. American Society of Mammalogists. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [2] – Butynski, T.M., De Jong, Y.A., Wieczkowski, J. and King, J. 2020. Cercocebus galeritus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T4200A17956330. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [3] – Groves, C.P., Andrews, P. and Horne, J.F.M. 1974. Tana River colobus and mangabey. Oryx 12(5): 565-575. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [4] – Paddock, C.L., Ferreira da Silva, M.J., McCabe, G.M., Fernández, D., McGraw, W.S. and Bruford, M.W. 2026. On the phylogenetic history of the Sanje mangabey (Cercocebus sanjei), Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania. International Journal of Primatology 47: 842-867. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [5] – Homewood, K. 1975. Can the Tana mangabey survive? Oryx 13(1): 53-59. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [6] – Elliot, D.G. 1913. A Review of the Primates, Vols. 2 and 3. Monographs of the American Museum of Natural History. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [7] – Mbora, D.N.M. and Munene, E. 2006. Gastrointestinal parasites of critically endangered primates endemic to Tana River, Kenya. Journal of Parasitology 92: 928-932. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [8] – Maisels, F., Hicks, T.C., Hart, J. and Shah, N. 2020. Cercocebus agilis (amended version of 2019 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T136615A167735266. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [9] – McCabe, G., Rovero, F., Fernández, D., Butynski, T.M. and Struhsaker, T.T. 2019. Cercocebus sanjei. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T4203A17955753. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [10] – Homewood, K.M. and Rodgers, W.A. 1981. A previously undescribed mangabey from southern Tanzania. International Journal of Primatology 2: 47-55. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [11] – Butynski, T.M., De Jong, Y.A. and King, J. 2020. Piliocolobus rufomitratus (amended version of 2019 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T136939A166599765. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [12] – Dempsey, A., Fernández, D., McCabe, G. et al. 2024. Cercocebus and Mandrillus conservation action plan 2024-2028. IUCN SSC PSG. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [13] – Wieczkowski, J.A. 2003. Aspects of the ecological flexibility of the Tana mangabey (Cercocebus galeritus) in its fragmented habitat, Tana River, Kenya. PhD dissertation, University of Georgia. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [14] – Wieczkowski, J. 2004. Ecological correlates of abundance in the Tana mangabey (Cercocebus galeritus). American Journal of Primatology 63: 125-138. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [15] – Kinnaird, M.F. 1992. Competition for a forest palm: use of Phoenix reclinata by human and nonhuman primates. Conservation Biology 6: 101-107. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [16] – Wieczkowski, J. 2009. Puncture and crushing resistance scores of Tana River mangabey (Cercocebus galeritus) diet items. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 140: 572-577. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [17] – Homewood, K.M. 1978. Feeding strategy of the Tana mangabey (Cercocebus galeritus galeritus). Journal of Zoology 186: 375-391. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [18] – Wieczkowski, J. and Kinnaird, M. 2008. Shifting forest composition and primate diets: a 13-year comparison of the Tana River mangabey and its habitat. American Journal of Primatology 70: 339-348. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [19] – Kinnaird, M.F. 1992. Variable resource defense by the Tana River crested mangabey. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 31: 115-122. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [20] – Wieczkowski, J. 2005. Examination of increased annual range of a Tana mangabey (Cercocebus galeritus) group. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 128: 381-388. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [21] – Wieczkowski, J. 2010. Tana River mangabey use of nonforest areas: functional connectivity in a fragmented landscape in Kenya. Biotropica 42: 598-604. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [22] – Wieczkowski, J. 2013. Ecological consequences of a group fission event in the Tana River mangabey. African Journal of Ecology 51: 544-551. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [23] – Wahungu, G.M. 2001. Common use of sleeping sites by two primate species in Tana River, Kenya. African Journal of Ecology 39: 18-23. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [24] – Kinnaird, M.F. 1990. Pregnancy, gestation and parturition in free-ranging Tana River crested mangabeys (Cercocebus galeritus galeritus). American Journal of Primatology 22: 285-289. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [25] – Kivai, S.M. 2018. Effects of food nutritional and mechanical properties on foraging of juvenile in wild Tana River mangabeys, Cercocebus galeritus, Kenya. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [26] – Medley, K.E. 1993. Primate conservation along the Tana River, Kenya: an examination of the forest habitat. Conservation Biology 7: 109-121. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [27] – Karere, G.M., Oguge, N.O., Kirathe, J., Muoria, P.K., Moinde, N.N. and Suleman, M.A. 2004. Population sizes and distribution of primates in the lower Tana River forests, Kenya. International Journal of Primatology 25: 351-365. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [28] – Mbora, D.N.M. and McPeek, M.A. 2010. Endangered species in small habitat patches can possess high genetic diversity: the case of the Tana River red colobus and mangabey. Conservation Genetics 11: 1725-1735. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [29] – Moinde-Fockler, N.N., Oguge, N.O., Karere, G.M., Otina, D. and Suleman, M.A. 2007. Human and natural impacts on forests along lower Tana river, Kenya. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 1161-1173. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [30] – Mbora, D.N.M., Wieczkowski, J. and Munene, E. 2009. Links between habitat degradation, and social group size, ranging, fecundity, and parasite prevalence in the Tana River mangabey. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 140: 562-571. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.
  • [31] – Republic of Kenya. 2013. Wildlife Conservation and Management Act, 2013 (No. 47 of 2013), sections 37 and Sixth Schedule. Accessed October 26, 2026. Link.

About the author

Arjun Jayakrishna
4 yrs
research

Arjun Jayakrishna

Wildlife Writer and Photographer, BioExplorer.net


Arjun is a science writer and wildlife photographer at BioExplorer.net. He turns new research on animals into clear, accurate reads for curious readers. His work covers animal behavior, ecology, and newly described species. He holds a Cornell Lab of Ornithology certificate in bird biology. He is pursuing an HBSc at the University of Toronto Mississauga.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *